SEE WHAT TRULY PERSONAL MEANS

BEFORE AND AFTER RESULTS

See the proven results of non-invasive microfocused ultrasound technology

Debbie, 55

I noticed my neck wasn’t as tight, my brow line was lower than it used to be and my chest just looked a bit older. My Ultherapy® provider was able to use real-time Visualization to see where I needed a collagen boost the most. I’m super happy with the outcome. I mean I still look like me, just me a few years ago.†.

Before
After (180 Days)
Before
After (90 Days)
Before
After (60 Days)

grace, 46

 As a doctor, Ultherapy® immediately stood out to me. It’s a non-invasive, FDA-cleared ultrasound treatment that lifts and tightens. Most important to me though is that it’s safe. For anyone who’s wondering if the treatment works, I’d say, ‘The proof is in the pictures!’†.

Before
After (180 Days)
Before
After (120 Days)
Before
After (60 Days)

Erin, 36

What can I say? I like to be ahead of the game. When I read Ultherapy® is the Gold Standard for non-invasive lifting and tightening without downtime, it was GAME. OVER. The treatment boosted my body’s own collagen and elastin production which basically meant my skin would look firmer. I mean, my skin is looking tight!†.

Before
After (180 Days)
Before
After (120 Days)
Before
After (60 Days)

MORE PATIENT RESULTS

See your own “Before and After”

Visit the Selfie Simulator →

Have questions about Ultherapy®?

Explore Frequently Asked Questions →

REFERENCES:

  1. 1. Ulthera® Instructions for Use.
  2. 2. Fabi SG, Joseph J, Sevi J, Green JB, Peterson JD. Optimizing patient outcomes by customizing treatment with microfocused ultrasound with visualization: gold standard consensus guidelines from an expert panel. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(5):426-432.
  3. 3. Park JY, et al. Customized Treatment Using Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization for Optimized Patient Outcomes: A Review of Skintightening Energy Technologies and a Pan-Asian Adaptation of the Expert Panel's Gold Standard Consensus. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2021;14(5):E70-E79.
  4. 4. Whitney ZB, Zito PM. Anatomy, skin, superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) fascia. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519014/. Updated October 27, 2018. Accessed December 9, 2019
  5. 5. Suh DH, Choi JH, Lee SJ, Jeong KH, Song KY, Shin MK. Comparative histometric analysis of the effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound and radiofrequency on skin. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2015;17(5):230-236.
  6. 6. Fabi SG, Massaki A, Eimpunth S, Pogoda J, Goldman MP. Evaluation of microfocused ultrasound with visualization for lifting, tightening, and wrinkle reduction of the décolletage. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(6):965-971.
  7. 7. Werschler WP, Werschler PS. Longterm efficacy of micro-focused ultrasound with visualization for lifting and tightening lax facial and neck skin using a customized vectoring treatment method. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9(2):27-33.
  8. 8. Pavicic T, Ballard JR, Bykovskaya T, et al. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization: Consensus on safety and review of energy-based devices. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021.
  9. 9. Sasaki G, Grossman J, Fabi SG, et al. Stimulation of Collagen Synthesis in Human Skin Following Microfocused Ultrasound Therapy. Presented at the ASDS 2018 Annual Meeting.
  10. 10. White WM, Makin IR, Barthe PG, Slayton MN, Gliklich RE. Selective creation of thermal injury zones in the superficial musculoaponeurotic system using intense ultrasound therapy: a new target for noninvasive facial rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(1):22-29.
  11. 11. Data on file.